By: Daniel Finnegan  [4/28/22]

“The more you know, the less you need.”
― Yvon Chouinard, Let My People Go Surfing: The Education of a Reluctant Businessman

In a design patent application, “the subject matter which is claimed is the design embodied in or applied to an article of manufacture (or portion thereof) and not the article itself.” United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Chapter 1500, Section 1502

In other words, a design patent application aims to protect what a product looks like, not how it functions (i.e., not its utility, which is proper subject matter for the other type of patent application, the utility patent application). This explains why, if you open any design patent, you will quickly notice that it is 90+ percent drawings.

The second big difference between the design patent application and the utility patent application is that the design patent application only allows for one claim. In other words, as a general rule, the design patent application can only protect one embodiment – i.e., only one ‘look’ of the product can be protected per application. (There are exceptions/qualifications to that rule, but we will save that for another blog.) And so, 90+ percent of a typical design patent application are drawings of the same looking product, shown from sufficient views so that it is enabling to a person skilled in the art.

With that said, a design patent applicant need not claim the entirety of their product, and as a result, they can expand the scope of their one claim. The expansion of scope is possibly because solid lines in design patent drawings are the only things that define what the one claim is. Thus, the less you draw – in solid lines – the broader the resulting patent would be since infringement is found where the would-be infringer has at least everything claimed regardless of whether they have additional elements. 

Hammer HeadSince a picture is worth a thousand words, here is a patented hammer head (U.S. Patent No. D719,242). Note that the handle portion of the hammer is “disclaimed” with dashed lines. Thus, the claim is limited to just the hammer head portion (shown in solid lines). The legal consequence is that someone is infringing this patent if they have a hammer head that looks like the one seen in the attached image – regardless of what their hammer handle looks like.

Some might shrug and say, “so what, I heard design patents offer very little protection.” And I would say, ask Samsung®, whose patent infringement suits vis-à-vis Apple®, that resulted in a 9-figure judgement, center on three patents, two of them design patents. Also, online marketplaces like Amazon® honor design patents as intellectual property rights they enforce via their “Amazon’s Report Infringement form,” through which a (design) patent holder/seller can have the Amazon listings of an infringer removed (assuming Amazon makes that determination). And since design patent application, as compared to utility patent application, are far less expensive, go through the USPTO quicker, and have a far greater likelihood of issuing as a patent, that makes them an affordable way to enforce and enhance your product. And now that you know more, you can claim less with greater impact.

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig’s highly experienced intellectual property attorneys have advanced technical degrees, vast knowledge, and practical experience. We leverage our experience to optimize the strategic value of your intellectual property.

To learn more about Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig and how we assist you with your legal matters, contact us by calling 800-747-9354 or emailing clientservices@dbllawyers.com.


Tagged with: , , ,

Posted in: Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property - Patents

  • Contact Us

    Contact Form

  • (800) 747-9354